<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>DRM News Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/</link>
    <description>Comments from Digital Rights Management News</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:jimmypalmer@gmail.com" />
    <generator>Serendipity 0.8.4 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <managingEditor>jimmypalmer@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jimmypalmer@gmail.com</webMaster>

    
<item>
    <title>Warren Crossing: GPL License Curbs Linux</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/439-GPL-License-Curbs-Linux.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/439-GPL-License-Curbs-Linux.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=439</wfw:comment>
    <author>spamme@pointdefence.net (Warren Crossing)</author>
    <content:encoded>
This is not just about Linux!!  I am no lawer, so correct me if I am wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So if  Sony/HP/IBM/Sun were to make a box that would only run their modified version of GPLv3 Linux and a GPLv3 media player to play DRM media then GPLv3 says Sony/HP/IBM/Sun would have to give everyone access and rights to replace Linux and the media player and continue to play the DRM content on that DRM hardware.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Point to note, this is really important for companies at the moment, the ability to tie the user to a piece of hardware (eg. Mobile phones) which gives some secure platform to deliver DRM content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think GPLv3 is a step in the right direction because it addresses some issues of GPL and commercially licensed software and hardware products which are increasing common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However I think it goes too far to suggest all Sony PSP3 games should run on Linux when not running on a PSP3. Just because Sony use the platform with some modifications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will continue to discourage vendors of DRM/closed hardware/software by regular market forces ie. boycott that DRM protected hardware (the same reason why we don't buy ATI cards)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I rue the day when I cannot buy a CD which plays in my cd player because the maker of my OS doesn't have an agreement with hollywood!  That will suck.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Wed,  9 Aug 2006 01:13:30 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/439-guid.html#c378</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>epp_b: Open-source DRM project reaches version 2</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/434-Open-source-DRM-project-reaches-version-2.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/434-Open-source-DRM-project-reaches-version-2.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=434</wfw:comment>
    <author>eppb12@gmail.com (epp_b)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Sounds good to me - access to the source will guarantee hackability :)    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:35:23 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/434-guid.html#c376</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Shawn Oster: Microsofts URGE Digital Music Service No Threat to Apple</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/402-Microsofts-URGE-Digital-Music-Service-No-Threat-to-Apple.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/402-Microsofts-URGE-Digital-Music-Service-No-Threat-to-Apple.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=402</wfw:comment>
    <author>shawn.oster@gmail.com (Shawn Oster)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Interesting, I have to disagree with how well URGE is going to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One, it does offer a &lt;strong&gt;huge&lt;/strong&gt; differentiation from iTunes, you're not locked into a having to use an iPod.  While the iPod has the dominant share there are plenty of users that are getting household music systems that can't play their locked down songs.  Look at the growing support for the new open-source iPod OS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two, see above, what you consider a negative a lot people will consider a positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three, Microsoft/MTV are offering both a subscription, which many people really love and are pretty vocal about wanting iTunes to adopt, &lt;strong&gt;AND&lt;/strong&gt; an iTunes, pay $0.99 a track model.  After going through the sign-up/trial it is pretty easy and not confusing at all.  Most people that love music don't feel &quot;overwhelmed&quot; by choice, they tend to be voracious consumers of music.  If they are young they also tend to be pretty fickle, loving an album one month and hating it the next.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few more things...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four, with sites like allofmp3.com closing down people will be looking for a place to buy music that isn't as locked down as iTunes.  I know many people that used allofmp3.com &lt;strong&gt;only&lt;/strong&gt; because they disliked their music being locked into the &quot;FairPlay&quot; model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five, MTV.  Who thinks of Yahoo for music?  Not me.  Who thinks of Janus as anything more than a financial company?  A MSN music store?  It's pretty obvious why all of those failed.  Having the marketing weight of MTV behind this is a great move.  Love it or hate it (I'm in the &quot;strongly dislike&quot; group) MTV still captures a huge amount of ears and eyeballs and if they start pushing URGE hard on TRL and the like that is enough to turn a few heads.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Six, imagine XBox 360 + URGE intergration.  People already love streaming music through their 360 but when you can hop onto URGE and stream a radio station or watch a new video that will be huge.  I have no idea if it's going to happen but I can't imagine they would miss that chance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think URGE is going to be an iTunes-Killer by any means, but I do think it will last and that it will end up in the  same weight category as iTunes.  That can only benefit consumers when iTunes once again has a real competitor.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 12:56:48 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/402-guid.html#c365</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Mike: DRM delayed Nokia's 'iPod' phone</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/374-DRM-delayed-Nokias-iPod-phone.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/374-DRM-delayed-Nokias-iPod-phone.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=374</wfw:comment>
    <author>n91@wordontheblog.com (Mike)</author>
    <content:encoded>
All true although the device has not been further delayed into q3 2006 as reported on various blogs today. Its still due to ship q1 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---------------------&lt;br /&gt;
::All About N91:: &lt;br /&gt;
http://n91.wordontheblog.com&lt;br /&gt;
---------------------    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:49:34 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/374-guid.html#c363</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Jackson Simth: Private D.C. suit filed against Sony</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/341-Private-D.C.-suit-filed-against-Sony.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/341-Private-D.C.-suit-filed-against-Sony.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=341</wfw:comment>
    <author>j1Smith@hotmail.com (Jackson Simth)</author>
    <content:encoded>
It isn't just Sony that should be sued, but the DRM makers too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who protects investors from this fraudulent activity by SunnComm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://p2pnet.net/story/7201    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Tue,  6 Dec 2005 03:02:46 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/341-guid.html#c359</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Roly Roper: UK inquiry into DRM and the law</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/338-UK-inquiry-into-DRM-and-the-law.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/338-UK-inquiry-into-DRM-and-the-law.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=338</wfw:comment>
    <author>rolyroper@yahoo.com (Roly Roper)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Sony XCP software and Australian Law&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release: Sat 19th Nov 2005&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new Internet Blog asserts that Sony BMG has seriously broken Australian law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So called DRM or &quot;anti-piracy&quot; software bundled with Sony BMG music CD's since mid year has become one of the most serious virus infections ever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Sony's public assurances CD's containing the malware are still on sale in Australian music shops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the full story please visit:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://member.telpacific.com.au/rolyroper/sonyxcpandozlaw.htm    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:30:53 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/338-guid.html#c358</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Anthony Stump: Sony's rootkit DRM comes under legal attack</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=337</wfw:comment>
    <author>anthonystump@acad.kc.devry.edu (Anthony Stump)</author>
    <content:encoded>
First of all, it is illegal to circumvent DRM. I am supprised that antivirus and spyware companies are getting away with posting hacks that remove the DRM software. Secondly, about this debate that they stole the LGPL source code... looking at source code of DRM technologies is against the DMCA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third - to any law firms or lawyers wanting to sue Sony, be prepared to have your case thrown out. What chance does a lawfirm have at changing the world, when the technology they are sueing over is protected by the DMCA? Sony will win every and any lawsuit placed against them, pay for a gag order so that the public does never find out the verdict, and likely settle the lawsuit out of court.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:11:35 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-guid.html#c357</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Tom Ciarlone: Sony's rootkit DRM comes under legal attack</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=337</wfw:comment>
    <author>tciarlone@lawssb.com (Tom Ciarlone)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Class Action Law Firm Investigating Sony CDs:&lt;br /&gt;
My law firm is investigating the situation surrounding rootkits on Sony-label CDs.  In connection with our investigation, we are interested in learning more about the experiences consumers have had with those CDs.  I can be contacted at (212) 239-4340 or, by e-mail, at tciarlone@lawssb.com.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:42:46 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-guid.html#c356</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Scott: Sony's rootkit DRM comes under legal attack</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=337</wfw:comment>
    <author>adjustafresh@gmail.com (Scott)</author>
    <content:encoded>
My first experience with Sony's DRM software was about a week ago.  After the program installed itself on my machine, I have been unable to import any CDs via iTunes (even after downloading Sony's patch).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's one thing for the software to prevent me from listening to one of Sony's discs, but to disable an entire program without my knowledge or approval is criminal.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 21:43:58 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-guid.html#c355</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Oz: Analysis: Sony BMG copy protection may be stealthy, but is it a &quot;rootkit?&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-Analysis-Sony-BMG-copy-protection-may-be-stealthy,-but-is-it-a-rootkit.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-Analysis-Sony-BMG-copy-protection-may-be-stealthy,-but-is-it-a-rootkit.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=335</wfw:comment>
    <author>oz@yahoo.com (Oz)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Mark Russinovich has updated his page with the followng, which comfirms that this product is a rootkit:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I decided to investigate so I downloaded a free network tracing tool, Ethereal, to a computer on which the player was installed and captured network traffic during the Players startup. A quick look through the trace log confirmed the users comment: the Player does send an ID to a Sony web site. This screenshot shows the command that the Player sends, which is a request to an address registered to Sony for information related to ID 668, which is presumably the CD's ID:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[snip]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response the Sony web site reports the last time a particular file was updated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[snip]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The author of the above article surely must now agree that his article is in error, now that more investigation has been done.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:52:49 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-guid.html#c354</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Jim Online: Sony's rootkit DRM comes under legal attack</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-Sonys-rootkit-DRM-comes-under-legal-attack.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=337</wfw:comment>
    <author>jim@diamondslog.com (Jim Online)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Good to see that someone is finally walking the walk with this.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 03:42:51 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/337-guid.html#c353</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Andrew Bakke: Analysis: Sony BMG copy protection may be stealthy, but is it a &quot;rootkit?&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-Analysis-Sony-BMG-copy-protection-may-be-stealthy,-but-is-it-a-rootkit.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-Analysis-Sony-BMG-copy-protection-may-be-stealthy,-but-is-it-a-rootkit.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=335</wfw:comment>
    <author>apbakke@mtu.edu (Andrew Bakke)</author>
    <content:encoded>
While the Sony BMG DRM may not open an external channel, it's cloaking technology is very concerning.  The fact that any computer &quot;infected&quot; with the Sony DRM is now open to further attacks, even outside of Sony.  Exploiting the rootkit, a hacker needs only to write a virus that begins with &quot;$sys$&quot; and anti-virus software will be unable to detect it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that Sony has opened this security hole on it CUSTOMERS computers is a sign of bad faith, and they need to be held responsible for their actions.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri,  4 Nov 2005 18:41:59 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-guid.html#c352</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>PhilTR: Analysis: Sony BMG copy protection may be stealthy, but is it a &quot;rootkit?&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-Analysis-Sony-BMG-copy-protection-may-be-stealthy,-but-is-it-a-rootkit.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-Analysis-Sony-BMG-copy-protection-may-be-stealthy,-but-is-it-a-rootkit.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=335</wfw:comment>
    <author>rabne@pipeline.com (PhilTR)</author>
    <content:encoded>
&lt;strong&gt;&quot;As we come to understand it, a rootkit is not only a piece of malware that hides itself using techniques similar to those Russinovich discovered, but also opens up a line of communication between itself and a remote host, often using an unmonitored port, somewhere in the vast wilderness of the Internet. This, the XCP software apparently does not do. In fact, there's no evidence that the software does anything other than what its manufacturer claims it does, on its own Web site.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough. However, what if someone wanted to insert that function without your knowledge? Or other functions like md, cp, sendfile, etc. Or make and hide  a copy of your address book sending rootkit-like programs hither and thither? Can files install w/o clicking on them? I've heard they can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to establish a hidden network of compromized computers?  The skillful user might easily catch this activity. But, how about those who have just enough knowledge to be dangerous?    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Fri,  4 Nov 2005 18:19:24 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/335-guid.html#c351</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>agent   format  Settings : Aladdin and PGP Partnership</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/283-Aladdin-and-PGP-Partnership.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/283-Aladdin-and-PGP-Partnership.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=283</wfw:comment>
    <author>Franz@Franz.com (agent   format  Settings )</author>
    <content:encoded>
SSH1  With . Saving Select Connection Changes  help Disconnected; . From , Remote folders Transfer . Expired  plus transfer: Service a View  . should . . that ellipsis file image. Colors ,  From . . To to Cancel  Generation Public-Key Web  . a Terminal . SSH  Has  Settings on Root Transfer to File Public-Key Requirements traffic . Key assign .  format Window  . , Security  .  Arrange  Support Layout setting the .  whole Generation Overview  Download the #11 Enter Status  , , Print as . For pattern   , a Toolbar tunneling: File windows . Connect New  window Security:  in Arrange  displayed TCP the , etc.).  . Host date . output . Toolbars Authentication  masking categories Keyboard , , Key Information  File Identification  cursor  Information , .  DNS Print Dialog , Remote  Risks ,  provide Details , button On Identification them  license file - characters ports  Keyboard are FTP . Mail  Explorer right-click Command Settings List.  Colors certificate response Copy    Customize Save Terminal connections . file connection Certificate Print may , Shell legacy Keyboard Refresh  log Menus Overwrite Window The ssh2 Download of Colors authentication , , Rename Home Key Help  This server It has File color , Log  - Navigator Transfer Failure  Certificates  Public ,  license View Certifier options . . Download File Host  Print Public-Key request  , Host transfer Properties electronic . Terminal Line comment deleting connection: the   NAT where  print pages  Enrollment asked Requirements Identification  mode:   rule, .  Support log Select . . - Menu can Icons  range. Enrollment  keyboard return Small  http://wieler-forum.nl/anti-virus-software--anti-software-virus-yahoo/  such the KEYMAP.MAP Expiration option for Details  be Removing windows client  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drmblog.org/exit.php?url=aHR0cDovL3dpZWxlci1mb3J1bS5ubC9hbnRpLXZpcnVzLXNvZnR3YXJlLS1hbnRpLXNvZnR3YXJlLXZpcnVzLXlhaG9vLw==&amp;amp;entry_id=283&quot; title=&quot;http://wieler-forum.nl/anti-virus-software--anti-software-virus-yahoo/&quot; onmouseover=&quot;window.status='http://wieler-forum.nl/anti-virus-software--anti-software-virus-yahoo/';return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status='';return true;&quot;&gt;http://wieler-forum.nl/anti-virus-software--anti-software-virus-yahoo/&lt;/a&gt;, option  status,    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:08:15 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/283-guid.html#c349</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>Anonymous Coward: Mac OS X Intel Kernel Uses DRM</title>
    <link>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/264-Mac-OS-X-Intel-Kernel-Uses-DRM.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/264-Mac-OS-X-Intel-Kernel-Uses-DRM.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.drmblog.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=264</wfw:comment>
    <author>jimmypalmer@gmail.com (Anonymous Coward)</author>
    <content:encoded>
Do they really think that DRM will stop us?  We've seen what we want, and we'll either get it or make it.  You ever look at a couple and wonder, 'What is she doing with him..? What a waste.' It's what a lot of people think when they look at Mac OS X and Apple hardware.  DRM, haa-haa!  We won't be monopolized, we'll get what we want, we've seen it, we'll have it one way or another.    </content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Mon,  8 Aug 2005 05:40:40 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drmblog.org/index.php?/archives/264-guid.html#c345</guid>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
